This uncertainty causes strategic paralysis. Investment decisions are delayed. Transformational initiatives stall. Organizations wait for clarity that may never come.
But what if this isn’t a passing storm? What if heightened uncertainty is the new operating environment? The most successful organizations won’t be those waiting for the fog to lift—they’ll be those that learn to navigate confidently within it, transforming uncertainty from an excuse for inaction into a catalyst for competitive advantage.
We are starting to see some organizations update their planning and decision-making processes, but that’s just one part of the equation to help organizations be more adept at moving forward when uncertainty is high and being more resilient when the environment shifts dramatically. What we rarely see is a recognition that there are human traits and personal characteristics that are better suited for stable rather than volatile environments.
First, some examples. Stable industries are those where demand fluctuations are minor, technological disruption happens over long periods of time, competition and regulation are fairly stable, barriers to entry are high, and the impact of economic cycles is more muted. Industries that historically meet these criteria include utilities, banking and insurance, staple consumer goods, and some traditional manufacturing. Government agencies have historically fit this profile as career staff, regulations, and bureaucratic processes can dampen the impact of political appointees.
Volatile industries have the opposite characteristics. Examples include the technology, media and entertainment, biotechnology and pharmaceutical, and retail industries.
Second, over time, companies in these industries not only developed the management processes to survive and thrive in their environments, but the cognitive profiles and leadership styles of those industries evolved to optimize for the conditions they operated in.
How organizations in these industries evolved:
Of course, in each of these dimensions, there are shared characteristics that are valued in both environments, such as a focus on effective performance management, ethical and vision alignment, digital transformation, data, customer centricity, and talent.
However, given the differences across these dimensions, it’s not surprising that different personal skills, optimized for each environment, emerged too. The following table highlights some of the more opposing characteristics that fit leaders in either stable or volatile industries.
Similar to the other dimensions, across these personal aspects, there are characteristics that are beneficial in stable and volatile settings, such as critical thinking, accountability, empathy, learning orientation, visionary communications, and team building.
Although these are generalizations, to the extent they hold true in traditionally stable industries, they demonstrate how deep the transformation needs to be if organizations in traditionally stable industries are to succeed in increasingly volatile environments.
The intent isn’t to say that organizations in stable industries need to abandon all the characteristics in the left column and take on all the characteristics in the right column to adapt to environments with more uncertainty than they’ve historically operated in. But the cognitive and leadership qualities that thrive in uncertainty are fundamentally different from those that excel in stability. This isn’t merely an interesting observation—it’s an urgent call for transformation in how organizations select, develop, and empower their leaders.
The implications are profound:
First, organizations must reassess their leadership benches not just for what these individuals have accomplished, but for how their minds work. The executive who masterfully optimizes existing systems may struggle more than the one who navigates ambiguity with ease. This requires a fundamental shift in how we evaluate leadership potential and how we intentionally construct cognitively diverse teams.
Second, leadership development must evolve beyond traditional competency models to intentionally cultivate cognitive flexibility, comfort with contradiction, and the ability to make confident decisions with incomplete information. These aren’t soft skills—they’re essential cognitive capabilities backed by neuroscience.
Finally, and perhaps most critically, organizations must recognize that this shift isn’t temporary. The leaders who will drive sustainable success aren’t those waiting for certainty to return, but those who have developed the psychological architecture to transform uncertainty into strategic advantage.
The organizations that thrive in the coming decade won’t be those that found the right processes for uncertainty. They’ll be those who developed and empowered the right minds for it.
The question isn’t whether your industry will face unprecedented uncertainty—it’s whether your leadership is cognitively equipped to turn that uncertainty into opportunity while others remain paralyzed by it.
To prepare for success in uncertain environments, organizations need to look at both their operational processes and the skills and capabilities of their leaders. Changing only processes will, at best, lead to a compliance-based, check-the-box approach to strategic planning and execution. At Toffler Associates, our expertise is in analyzing and preparing organizations for uncertainty in both how they operate and how they think with innovative planning approaches.
Contact us if you would like more information on how to align processes and human traits to truly prepare organizations for success in uncertain environments.
About the Authors